Getting carried away
Someone posted a very thoughtful comment on my post with all the Eminem ranting, and had some very valid points: one about considering the validity of protest music that doesn't present a solution, and another about stereotyping voters of all types. Here are some spur-of-the-moment thoughts (I'm sure I'll have more): The first one makes me think a lot. Like all protest music, the Eminem song is loaded. And the timing is telling. Somebody wants to persuade others that the Bush administration is wrong. If I didn't agree, I suppose I'd be less than thrilled. However, I do embrace the passion that's going on in this election, on both sides. It's invigorating that people care so much this time. Lord knows, I didn't use to. I find it exciting that creative people are getting involved, even if I disagree with their political viewpoint. I do disagree with Eminem on lots of things. Regarding the responsibility of artists...well, sometimes I think it's an artist's job to point toward solutions, lead the way, etc. And sometimes I think it's the artist's job to give voice to the raging howl inside, which so often has no solution - just the howl itself. Both are needed. Like "Born in the USA" -- Bruce didn't offer a solution, he just posed lots of questions. In his own way, he was just as angry as Eminem. One thing that I found exciting about Eminem's involvement was that he is, in many ways, the voice of many young people in America. To hear, through him, that many of them are listening, caring, marching, moshing, whatever...Well, that's exciting to me. I'd much rather that than have kids be numb and checked out, politically. The flower children of the 60s didn't often have solutions either, but they made their voices heard. I'm glad voices are getting heard. Just last night, I watched a really exciting show on BET where real people talked passionately, but respectfully, with each other about the issues in this election. I loved it! Why isn't that dialogue more acceptable, encouraged and prevalent in all of our society? Dunno. Now, about stereotyping voters. You got me on that one: I was surprised by the photo of (what I assume to be) a redneck-looking woman passionately holding up a Kerry/Edwards sign. I'm wrong to judge people by their looks, and glad to be reminded of that. But I won't give up my pleasure at the woman's defiant, passionate expression. Because of my own political viewpoint, I am glad that salt-of-the-earth people who (I feel) are being maltreated by this administration are getting angry about it, and excited about the possibility of change. And I guess that's also how I feel about Eminem and the kids out there -- because I feel their future is being compromised, I'm glad to see they're getting uppity. That said, it's all only my p.o.v. (Which is okay--this is my blog.) Your mileage may vary. Hopefully so. And yes, we should all vote our consciences. Thanks to the anonymous commenter for offering me an opportunity to further examine mine.
4 Comments:
Well, then let me just stir things up regarding stereotypes by invoking . . Dixie Chicks.
1) A country singer said something not-so-flattering about Bush . . . and country music fans went nuts. Trashed their DC CD's, made death threats and other equally ridiculous things. And it was Big News. For a long time. Trust me, I had a 3rd row seat for the whole damn thing, including the bomb dogs before each concert, and went to sleep worried most nights.
2) Although living in NV, I am a Texan. In dealing with tourists day in and day out in my job, I am asked at least daily where I'm from. I'm taken aback at the number of people who immediately respond, "Texas, huh? I guess you're voting for Bush, then." (I usually respond, "Yeah, you'd think . . .")
3) Then Natalie was right. People assume because you're from the same place, you must have the same values.
4) So, yeah -- seeing someone who's a big country fan saying they're NOT for Bush is kind of a (heartwarming) shock for me, and others, too, I think.
5) Libertarian, huh? Damn --you make *me* look conservative. (yes, I'm teasing.)
~Ann
Marthachick... All I can say is: blog on!
I think I understand a little more now about how you view this song not as a piece of political rhetoric per-se, but as a voice with people you care about behind it. I can respect and admire that.
I guess I'm just more attuned to lower-key, more logical discussion when it comes to politics and this kind of "howling" tends to turn me off. (Maybe I'm just not as passionate about politics as I am about organic gardening... I'll bet if Eminem howled about the evils of pesticides I'd get all pumped up!)
I agree, though, that an artist shouldn't have to be a problem solver or answer to anyone about their art. But if that art is viewed in the context of influencing sombody's vote, it opens itself up to a bit more scrutiny. I guess I'm just frustrated by the lack of solutions being put forth by the people that are *supposed* to be the problem solvers.
Didn't mean to "get you" on stereotypes... I just hate to see superficial appearances get in the way of people understanding each other. As a soon-to-be father of a mixed-race child, I've been thinking about this alot lately.
Ann, just view the Texas stereotypes as a chance to surprise people and open their minds. It's quite fun. And by the way, Libertarian does not equal ultra-liberal (if that's what you were infering). Take a look at www.lp.org.
-Mike in South Austin
Thanks again, everybody. I hear ya, re: the Dixie Chicks, girlfriend. I used to love me some Diane Sawyer until her interview with them, when she wouldn't stop asking Natalie if she was ashamed... Ick.
And " I guess I'm just frustrated by the lack of solutions being put forth by the people that are *supposed* to be the problem solvers." Oh goodness, do I ever hear you.
Congrats on the baby, Mike in South Austin, BTW. My husband and I are of different races as well. Interesting future meme for discussion someday--the rising prevalence of mixed-race couples and kids among our generation and the younger one(s). I think it's fascinating that it's gradually becoming just not that big of a deal...
But that's a post for another day.
My best friend is a separatist Chilean pollster with three children fathered by an Italian leather lobbyist, a South African congressman, and a East LA tattoo artist named Butch respectively. Due to their extensive experience with international birth law, foreign political intrigue, body art and lackadaisical birth control there are all kinds of political figures seeking them out to give dissertations on superficial impressions and how those impressions affect the content of commercial airline safety brochures and campaign speeches.
Unfortunately, the local Santiago, Chile McDonalds staunchly refuses to acknowledge the children's right to vote in McDonalds' pick your favorite character content due to "obvious" conflicts in interest. Grimmace "knows" how those kinds of kids vote. Needless to say only the Jack in the Box family could understand the pain of being different.
Post a Comment
<< Home